Pages

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Campaign LEARN to Address Connecticut's Achievement Gap

Lawmakers from the Connecticut General Assembly’s Black and Puerto Rican Caucus announced a new statewide initiative on Tuesday that will focus on closing the achievement gap between white and poor& minority students in the state. 

Connecticut’s Campaign for Leadership in Education, Achievement, and Reform Now or Campaign LEARN is intended to bring awareness to Connecticut's persistent achievement gap, identify best practices in the state and country, and support and implement policies and reform efforts to help reduce the gap.

According to results of the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress for Math, Connecticut’s achievement gap is the worst in the nation. The gap between poor and non-poor students on the fourth grade math test is 2.79 grade levels and in eighth grade it is 3.41 grade levels. (For more information on Connecticut's achievement gap in 2009, click here)

At the press conference in Hartford,  Gwen Samuel, President of the State of Black CT Alliance, said:  "Our kids, we're finding out in the third and fourth grade that they're not reading at level. It shouldn't take the third or fourth grade to get to that.  We need early intervention, and let's be very clear, the federal government, who is about to award states who prove that they're ready to reform, the Race To The Top Grant, the Innovative Grant, the Early Learning grant, we must be ready to do what is needed to change the way we do business."

The Campaign is also sponsoring a series of town hall meetings throughout the state.  So far, meetings are planned for Hartford and Danbury.  According to a Campaign LEARN press release:
It is anticipated that information obtained by the lawmakers and advocacy groups during these town hall forums will impact education policy priorities of the General Assembly and lead to the introduction of key legislation during the 2010 legislative session that will address the achievement gap in a meaningful way.
In an interview with NorwalkNet, Ms. Samuel said that Campaign LEARNwould consider doing a town hall meeting in Norwalk.

"I recommend Norwalk have its own town hall meeting based on its shift in policy leaders, lack of superintendent and the importance of what monies are coming to Connecticut.  Norwalk needs a solid plan," she said adding that Norwalk should not simply expect that the State Commissioner of Education Mark McQuillan will advocate for Norwalk when applying for federal funds.

Ms. Samuel also said that there are many upcoming deadlines and that Norwalk's education leaders should address how it will use federal dollars to address the achievement gap.

"This is a one in a lifetime funding stream we cannot waste this money because of poor system implementations, lack of accountability and just plain ole "poor" decision making for rolling out programs, " she said.

The following organizations are partners in Campaign LEARN:  General Assembly’s Black and Puerto Rican Legislative Caucus led by State Representatives Jason Bartlett (D-Bethel, Danbury, Redding), Douglas McCrory (D-Hartford), Patricia Billie Miller (D-Stamford), and Gary Holder-Winfield (D-New Haven),  the Connecticut Black Alliance for Educational Options (CT BAEO), the State of Black Connecticut Alliance (SBCT), the Connecticut Commission on Children, the Connecticut State Conference of NAACP Branches, the Connecticut Coalition for Achievement Now (ConnCAN), the Connecticut Charter Schools Network, and the Yale Law School Education Adequacy Project Clinic.

Ms. Samuel also provided NorwalkNet with a slide presentation entitled "Ready by Five & Fine by Nine, New Requirements, New Opportunities." by Janice M Gruendel of the Yale Child Study Center which was presented to National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) on November 18th.  See slides 22 &23 for funding available and deadlines.  

The Hour ran a good story on Campaign LEARN yesterday.

9 comments:

  1. Looks like the State of Connecticut is having the same problem as Norwalk has with increasing test scores. Wow! Does that mean everyone on here can stop blaming the old Norwalk BOE, Norwalk's Black community, Norwalk's administrators, etc? It's just not about finger pointing when it comes to increasing test scores. The new BOE will learn that in time. They are just very wet behind the ears right now.
    Time to work together in an all inclusive community, just like the State is modeling.
    ReplyDelete
  2. The difference is that African American leaders in other parts of the state are proposing constructive concrete ideas not forming "Board Watcher" committees that are unconstructive.
    ReplyDelete
  3. The difference is that there is respect for all input in other parts of this state. There is no respect for that input on this forum or on the Board. Rationalize all you want. Norwalk is not a very nice place to be right now.
    ReplyDelete
  4. When will people finally understand that the gap is ECONOMIC not RACIAL! Poor whites are in the same gap as poor blacks! Until some social engineer figures out how to fix the economic gap(and it is immense), educational tweeking is futile. Does anybody in New Canaan worry about the gap? Greenwich claims it has a gap--it does--But it is purely an economic one within its borders. The racial gap is just a convenient(and necessary) way for the minority community to get attention to its plight. Where is the forum for poor whites, who, under the current economy, are increasing as we speak? Just playing "devil's advocate" here--but it's really all about economics. It always has been. The best indicator in gap data comes from the kids on "free or reduced lunch"--it might not be all on the "up and up", but it is race blind.
    ReplyDelete
  5. A blurb on YourCt.com indicates that at least one new member is very concerned with the achievement gap that exists for at-risk families due to economic issues. Two of the new people also made it a point to talk a lot about increasing early childhood education efforts (which also helps close the gap by helping to overcome economic disparities).

    http://www.yourct.com/new/2009/11/judging-people-by-the-color-of-their-skin/
    ReplyDelete
  6. I have been saying this all along...it's economic, not race. Thank you to the 6:31 poster for backing me up on this.
    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree that it is more about economics than it is about race. However, there is sometimes a racial component as well. Sometimes there is an expectation that minority children will not perform as well as others, and so there are lower expectations. I have heard them say it too many times. Sometimes well-intentioned teachers have lower expectations and they settle for less from minority kids. That is a fact. Sadly, there are bigoted teachers, too, although most are smart enough not to make it easily proven. I have known colleagues who are bigoted, and so I say that from direct knowledge.

    Then there is the other side of the argument, also undeniable, that some minority kids think it is too "White" to work hard at their studies.

    The point is that it is too easy to say that it is all about economics. There are other concerns that we have to address daily.
    ReplyDelete
  8. Can we say it's 80% economics and 20% race?
    ReplyDelete
  9. Any estimate I made would be a wild guess that would have no validity in the conversation. My point is that we can't forget about the racial component, and we need to address it, too. The problems exist on both sides, and so this isn't about finger pointing.
    ReplyDelete

ShareThis